I pulled data from the basketball-reference.com on players' 2012-13 win shares (WS), which reflect an estimate number of wins that a player contributed to his team last season, and on salary for the 2013-14 season. If a player's salary is not yet determined then I used the amount he will be charged against his team's salary cap. I divided 2013-14 salary by 2012-13 WS to get some rough estimate of the dollar per win a team can expect from a player assuming he performs identically next season as he did this season (and plays the same amount of games and minutes).
First a few points on win shares. The more a player plays the more likely he is to accumulate a larger WS. The statistic is not standardized thus injuries that cause a significant loss of game time or general low playing time adversely affect WS. (Basketball-reference.com does provide a standardized WS per 48 minutes of play where the top 5 are: LeBron [.322], Durant, [.291], CP3 [.287], Jeremy Evans [.208], and Tyson Chandler and Chris Andersen [.207]. Darko Milicic has the lowest--an astounding -.779--which suggests that extrapolating his 5 minutes of play in 2012/13 to a whole game, his presence on the court would virtually guarantee a loss for his team.)
Dividing WS by salary $ is important because it gives an idea of low cost players who disproportionately contribute to wins. The worst of the worst consists of big name players with negative win shares, like Danny Granger, Drew Gooden, Thomas Robinson, Quentin Richardson, Hedo Turkoglu, Ben Gordon, and Michael Beasely. The next group, the not quite worstest of the worst (but still awful), include players with a 0 WS, like Marcus Camby, Michael Pietrus Al Harrington and Miles Plumleee. Next the five players with the greatest salary to positive WS (basically, the least efficient players in terms of payroll besides those just listed). The dollar value next to the name reflects salary dollar per win:
The six (sixth place was added for obvious reasons) most valuable players in terms of salary per WS are:
First a few points on win shares. The more a player plays the more likely he is to accumulate a larger WS. The statistic is not standardized thus injuries that cause a significant loss of game time or general low playing time adversely affect WS. (Basketball-reference.com does provide a standardized WS per 48 minutes of play where the top 5 are: LeBron [.322], Durant, [.291], CP3 [.287], Jeremy Evans [.208], and Tyson Chandler and Chris Andersen [.207]. Darko Milicic has the lowest--an astounding -.779--which suggests that extrapolating his 5 minutes of play in 2012/13 to a whole game, his presence on the court would virtually guarantee a loss for his team.)
Dividing WS by salary $ is important because it gives an idea of low cost players who disproportionately contribute to wins. The worst of the worst consists of big name players with negative win shares, like Danny Granger, Drew Gooden, Thomas Robinson, Quentin Richardson, Hedo Turkoglu, Ben Gordon, and Michael Beasely. The next group, the not quite worstest of the worst (but still awful), include players with a 0 WS, like Marcus Camby, Michael Pietrus Al Harrington and Miles Plumleee. Next the five players with the greatest salary to positive WS (basically, the least efficient players in terms of payroll besides those just listed). The dollar value next to the name reflects salary dollar per win:
- Andrea Bargnani ($118.6 million)
- Linas Kleiza ($46.0 million)
- Kevin Seraphin ($27.6 million)
- Brendan Haywoon ($20.5 million)
- Daniel Gibson ($18.2 million)
The six (sixth place was added for obvious reasons) most valuable players in terms of salary per WS are:
- Chanlder Parsons ($132.4K)
- Nate Robinson ($149.9K)
- Jimmy Butler ($159.0K)
- Kenneth Faried ($175.3K)
- Isaiah Thomas ($176.9K)
- Andray Blatche ($180.5K)
Man, I read the WS and thought this was going to be a World Series column. All jokes aside I like the Pietrus shout and this is similar (in a non monetary way) to the WAR stat in baseball
ReplyDelete